Arizona’s Self-Defense Laws: Is Attacking an Intruder in Your Own Home Assault?

free case review

Fill out the form below, or call us at
(602) 560-7408.

practice areas

DUI DEFENSE

CRIMINAL DEFENSE

Recent Blog Posts

Attacking an Intruder in Your Own Home, is That Assault?

Home invasion is a terrifying experience that can leave lasting emotional and psychological scars.

According to a report by the FBI, Arizona has the 14th highest rate of property crimes in the United States.

In 2019 alone, there were 178,245 property crimes reported in Arizona.

These numbers underscore the need for Arizonans to protect themselves and their homes.

It’s a natural human response to want to defend oneself and one’s property in such situations.

However, there are legal boundaries to what constitutes self-defense, and the consequences of going beyond these limits can be severe.

This article will discuss the legalities surrounding attacking an intruder in your home and whether it can be classified as assault.

Topics to be discussed:


What is Arizona’s Castle Doctrine, and How Does it Apply to Self-Defense in the Home?

The Castle Doctrine is a legal principle that states that a person has the right to defend their home with deadly force against an intruder without having a duty to retreat.

The doctrine gets its name from the phrase “A man’s home is his castle,” indicating that an individual has the right to protect their home just like a king protects his castle.

In Arizona, the Castle Doctrine is enshrined in A.R.S. § 13-411.

It provides that an individual can use deadly force in self-defense when:

  1. The person reasonably believes that deadly force is necessary to prevent imminent harm or death to themselves or another person;
  2. The person is within their dwelling, which includes a house, an apartment, a mobile home, or an RV; and
  3. The intruder has unlawfully entered or attempted to enter the person’s home.

It is essential to note that the Castle Doctrine does not provide blanket immunity to use deadly force in every situation.

The force must be reasonable and necessary, and the individual must believe that they or another person is in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury.


Understanding Arizona’s Stand Your Ground Law and How it Applies to Self-Defense

Arizona’s Stand Your Ground law is a legal principle that allows individuals to use deadly force in self-defense when they are in a place where they have a legal right to be.

The law eliminates the legal obligation to retreat when confronted with a threat of violence, and it is codified in A.R.S. § 13-411.

The law provides that an individual can use deadly force in self-defense when:

  1. The person reasonably believes that deadly force is necessary to prevent imminent harm or death to themselves or another person;
  2. The person is in a place where they have a legal right to be; and
  3. The person is not engaged in criminal activity at the time.

Arizona’s Stand Your Ground law differs from the Castle Doctrine in that it applies to any location where a person has a legal right to be, not just the person’s dwelling.

It also extends beyond the use of deadly force and includes the use of non-deadly force in self-defense situations.

While the Stand Your Ground law provides more leeway for individuals to defend themselves in public places, it does not provide blanket immunity for using force.

The force used must be proportional to the threat of harm, and the person using force must reasonably believe it is necessary to protect themselves.

Additionally, the law does not protect individuals who are engaged in criminal activity at the time of the incident.

Understanding the Difference between Arizona’s Stand Your Ground Laws and Castle Doctrine in Self-Defense Situations

Scenario 1: Stand Your Ground

Liam is walking through a park at night when he is approached by two strangers who demand his wallet. Liam, feeling threatened, pulls out a gun and shoots both of the strangers, killing one of them. Liam claims self-defense under Arizona’s Stand Your Ground law, arguing that he reasonably believed that deadly force was necessary to protect himself from imminent harm or death.

In this scenario, Liam’s use of deadly force may be legally justified under Arizona’s Stand Your Ground law. He had a legal right to be in the park and reasonably believed that deadly force was necessary to protect himself from harm or death.

The law allows him to use deadly force in self-defense without a legal obligation to retreat.

Scenario 2: Castle Doctrine

Sara is at home when an intruder breaks into her house. The intruder is unarmed and poses no immediate threat to Sara’s life. Sara grabs a baseball bat and strikes the intruder, causing him to flee. The intruder is later found and arrested by the police. Sara claims self-defense under Arizona’s Castle Doctrine, arguing that she had a legal right to defend herself and her property.

In this scenario, Sara’s use of force to defend herself may be legally justified under Arizona’s Castle Doctrine.

The law allows a person to use force, including deadly force, to protect themselves and their property in their own dwelling.

However, the force used must be proportional to the threat of harm, and the person using force must reasonably believe that it is necessary to protect themselves and their property.


When Can Self-Defense Be Used as a Defense in an Assault Case?

In Arizona, self-defense can be used as a defense in an assault case if the accused person used force to defend themselves from imminent harm or injury.

A.R.S. § 13-404 provides the legal basis for self-defense in Arizona.

To use self-defense as a defense in an assault case, the accused person must:

  1. Reasonably believe that force was necessary to prevent imminent harm or injury;
  2. Believe that the force used was necessary to protect themselves or another person; and
  3. Use reasonable force; use no more force than necessary to defend themselves.

The accused person bears the burden of proving that they acted in self-defense.

The prosecution must prove that the force used was excessive and unnecessary to defend oneself.


While the Castle Doctrine and self-defense laws provide leeway for using force in self-defense situations, it is not a blanket immunity for any use of force.

Arizona law stipulates that the force used must be proportional to the threat of harm, and the person using force must reasonably believe it is necessary to protect themselves.

A.R.S. § 13-404 and A.R.S. § 13-406 provide the legal limits on using force in self-defense.

Under A.R.S. § 13-406, deadly force is only justified when the person reasonably believes it is necessary to defend themselves or another person from imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury.

If the threat of harm is not imminent, then force is unjustified.

Additionally, the force used must not be excessive or unreasonable.

Using force beyond what is necessary to protect oneself can result in criminal charges, such as assault or manslaughter.


What Should you Do if You are Involved in a Self-Defense Situation?

If you find yourself in a self-defense situation, it is essential to take immediate action.

Call the police, report the incident, and seek medical attention if necessary.

Do not discuss the incident with anyone, including friends or family members, until you have spoken with an experienced criminal defense attorney.

Preserving any evidence, such as video footage or witness statements, is crucial that may be useful in your defense.

An experienced criminal defense attorney can help you navigate the legal system, explain your rights and options, and protect your interests.

They can evaluate the evidence against you and determine the best strategy for your defense.

An excellent criminal defense attorney can also negotiate with the prosecutor to reduce or dismiss the charges against you.

In short, a criminal defense attorney can provide you with the best possible defense against assault charges and help you obtain the most favorable outcome in your case.


What are the Potential Consequences of Using Force in Self-Defense?

While using force in self-defense may be legally justified, it can still result in legal consequences.

If the force used is excessive or unjustified, it can result in criminal charges, such as assault or manslaughter.

Additionally, even if a person is not charged with a crime, they may still face a civil lawsuit from the intruder or their family for injuries or damages.

If you are facing criminal charges for assaulting an intruder in your home, you should seek the advice of an experienced criminal defense attorney.

They can help you understand your legal rights, evaluate the evidence against you, and determine your defense’s best course of action. 


Can I Solve This on My Own, or Do I Need an Attorney?

Defending oneself against criminal charges is daunting, especially when it involves assault charges.

The legal system can be complex, and it is easy to make mistakes that can hurt your case.

While it is possible to represent yourself in court, it is not advisable, particularly in severe criminal cases such as assault.

Criminal defense attorneys have the knowledge and expertise to defend against criminal charges, including assault charges.

They thoroughly understand the legal system and know how to navigate it to protect their client’s interests.

They can evaluate the evidence against you, determine the best defense strategy, negotiate with the prosecutor, and represent you in court.

An experienced criminal defense attorney can help you obtain the best possible outcome in your case, such as reduced or dismissed charges or an acquittal.

 


You Need a Criminal Defense Attorney If You Are Facing Domestic Violence Charges

Top Arizona DUI Defense Attorney Arja Shah Defending oneself and one’s home against an intruder is a natural human response.

However, it is essential to understand the legal boundaries surrounding self-defense and the consequences of going beyond these limits.

 If you are facing assault charges, it is crucial to seek the help of an experienced criminal defense lawyer.

With the help of a criminal defense attorney from the Shah Law Firm, you can navigate the complexities of the legal system.

Don’t let an assault charge derail your life; contact us today at (602) 560-7408 for a free consultation, and let our legal team work for you.

we are here to help

Fill out the form below, or call us directly at (602) 560-7408 to schedule your free, one-on-one consultation. There is no obligation and all consultations are strictly confidential.

WHAT OUR CLIENTs SAY

“I was totally impressed and grateful for the expertise and successful case Arja handled for me. She answered my calls immediately and saved me a lot of professional and personal heartache. Arja did a great job refuting the State’s evidence and convinced the Prosecutor that my chewing tobacco was a major issue in the case that the officer did not check.”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
Thomas - Super Extreme DUI
Argued Police Stop Protocols and Reduced to a Fine

“Arja represented me for a DUI case in Scottsdale. I met with her immediately after being charged and she very quickly was able to speak to the prosecutor and get my charges reduced after my initial hearings. She was attentive and easy to talk to. She gets results.”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
Jason - Scottsdale DUI
Felony Charges Reduced to Reckless Driving

“Arja was extremely knowledgeable and kept us up to date on the entire case. I would hire her and recommend her to anyone- although I hope I never need her help again! But if a problem arises I would be sure to call her!!”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
Maggie - Mesa Super Extreme DUI
Super Extreme DUI Reduced to First Time Regular DUI

“Ms. Shah got my charges completely dismissed. She worked hard, was thorough, and took care of all the details. Seriously, hire her. It’s a complete piece of mind.”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
R. Aguilera - Attempted Murder
Attempted Murder Charges DISMISSED

“During my recent DUI case and time spent working with Arja Shah, I can say I had an absolute positive Experience. She was there to represent me and handle my questions and concerns with ease. Thank you.”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
Michael - Phoenix DUI Arrest
Felony DUI Charge Reduced to a Fine

“I endorse this lawyer. She is knowledgeable as well as up-to-date on the latest case law. She is one of the very few attorneys I would recommend to family or friends.”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
Michael Pittman (Attorney Peer)

“First, Arja is a superb and energetic attorney who is always willing to listen and help out in client cases. Second, she works hard for your case to minimize or eliminate penalties for the charges you are facing. She has a good analytical mind and presents your case successfully. Third, she is approachable even outside work hours if the situation calls for it. Always punctual for meetings. Lastly, she is an affordable attorney in comparison to some big-name law firms where personalized and flexible service is almost impossible. The above review is based on my experience derived from her working on my case.”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
T. McCarty- Extreme DUI Charge Possible 30 Days Jail
Reduced to Reckless Driving and a Fine

“Attorney Arja Shah took the time to compile letters from family members and show the Prosecutor that they lacked evidence to move forward with my case. Arja did what she said she would do and was there to help me. Outstanding Attorney.”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
Andrea- Disorderly Conduct and Domestic Violence
Charged Dismissed

Considering the amount of charges I was facing I ended up with the minimum charges I could have received. If it wasn’t for Ms/Mrs. Shah, I would have had to given up everything. I will forever recommend to anybody in need…

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
Tyler Goodwill - DUI
Charges Reduced to Minimum
Click Here to Call Now