Is a Fingerprint Evidence Enough for a Criminal Conviction?

In many movies and television shows, a defendant will be identified and subsequently convicted of a crime after a detective finds his or her fingerprints at a crime scene. However, fingerprints are often not enough by themselves to result in a conviction. Instead, fingerprint evidence is often presented as one piece of evidence rather than the only evidence against a defendant.

When detectives discover fingerprints at a crime scene, they are commonly used in investigations to identify potential suspects or persons of interest. However, because of their limitations, police officers and prosecutors will often want to find additional types of evidence to secure a conviction.

If an officer finds your fingerprints, they will connect you to the crime scene. However, there is no way for the police to determine how long your fingerprints have been there. Interpreting fingerprints to match them may also result in mistaken identification.

While fingerprints might not have the evidentiary strength of DNA evidence, they are still used in criminal cases. Fingerprints are generally considered to be reliable, and juries understand what they mean. Every person has a series of ridges on their fingers that are ostensibly theirs and no one else’s.

 


How Fingerprints are Matched to a Suspect?

Two principles inform prosecutors about how to handle fingerprint evidence. The first principle is that the friction ridge patterns on your fingertips will not change during your life. The second principle is that every person has a unique pattern of friction ridges, including identical twins.

Fingerprints are used by police offers to identify suspects. They match fingerprints by comparing the fingerprints they have in police files with those that are found at the scene of a crime. The FBI has a searchable database that law enforcement officers can use to try to match unknown fingerprints to those contained in the database. Your fingerprints might be on file for many different reasons.

For example, you might have to be fingerprinted to gain security clearance for a new job or professional licensure. You can also be fingerprinted when you are placed under arrest. Many parents have their children fingerprinted by their local police departments so that they can be identified if they are the victims of crimes. No matter how your fingerprints are taken, once they are entered into the fingerprint database, they will be used for comparison purposes.

Fingerprint experts sometimes disagree about the number of points that are needed before a fingerprint match can be declared. For example, some fingerprint experts believe that a match has been found based on 12 points while others require 20 points to declare a match.


Speak to Arizona Criminal Defense Attorney Arja Shah Now

We are Open and Available to answer any questions. Free consultations by phone or video chat. Shah Law has successfully defended over 3,000 clients. We are on your side!


How are Fingerprints Found at a Crime Scene?

The friction ridges of your fingertips have numerous sweat pores. Your fingertips contain a mix of sweat, dirt, and oil that can be left on smooth surfaces when you touch them. These substances can leave behind an impression of the friction ridges of your fingers on the surfaces that you touch. Police officers use special chemical powders to make fingerprints visible.

After dusting different surfaces at a crime scene, the visibility of any prints will depend on the porosity of the surface. However, computer enhancements allow detectives to extrapolate complete fingerprints from fragments, and lasers can read markings that would otherwise be invisible.

It is not possible to determine the age of fingerprints. In many cases, a criminal defendant will try to explain that their fingerprints might be at the crime scene because of an earlier visit than when the crime occurred.

Fingerprints are used to connect a suspect with a crime scene based on the theory that no two individuals have the same fingerprints. However, it is possible that the different points on your fingertips might match the prints of someone else in the world. While your entire fingerprint might not be exactly the same, enough points might match to result in the police connecting you to a crime even if you were not present.

A good defense attorney might hire a fingerprint expert to review and compare your fingerprints to those found at the crime scene to help in this type of situation.

When fingerprint evidence is a major part of a criminal case, the prosecution will normally hire fingerprint experts to testify at trial and explain how the matching process worked. Your defense attorney can also call a fingerprint expert to challenge the evidence presented by the prosecutor’s expert.

Dusting for Fingerprint Evidence


Distinguishing Features of Fingerprint Evidence

When police rely on fingerprints to help to find a suspect for a crime, they normally pay the most attention to the fingerprints’ ridges and patterns. Regardless of how old you become, these areas of your fingerprints will remain the same. Fingerprint software might also identify more than one set of fingerprints that include similar details. However, these patterns will not be exact between two people.

Most complications arise when partial matches are found with incomplete fingerprints instead of entire marks. When this happens, a partial print will not offer too much help to the prosecutor’s case. Instead, the prosecutor will likely need much more conclusive evidence to present to the jury.

Law enforcement agencies are able to access the federal fingerprint database to try to match fingerprints and identify suspects or crime victims. The database increases the likelihood that some crimes will be solved.


What are the Limitations of Fingerprint Evidence?

In many cases, fingerprints found at crime scenes will not be matched to any known prints in a collection or database. This means that the suspect might not be identified through his or her fingerprints. Fingerprints might also result in someone being charged with a crime who is not the actual culprit.

For example, someone who lives in a home where a crime occurs will likely leave fingerprints throughout the residence even if he or she had nothing to do with what occurred.

Many perpetrators wear gloves when they commit crimes to prevent any fingerprints from being left behind. Others might clean the crime scene to avoid leaving this type of evidence behind. In these types of cases, fingerprints will not lead to a conviction of the perpetrators.

Another limitation is that fingerprints do not show any indications of their age and should not be considered viable evidence according to this article from the American Association for the Advancement of Science. If you happened to be in a room a decade ago, your prints might be found 10 years later when a crime in the same room is investigated. Having the help of a skilled criminal defense lawyer can help you to challenge any fingerprinting evidence that might be used against you in a criminal case.

Your attorney might try to determine when you might have left the prints. If you were never there, he or she might hire a fingerprint expert to demonstrate that the state’s match is inaccurate.


Get Immediate Help from a Criminal Defense Lawyer

While television shows might make you believe that all is lost when your fingerprints have been found at a crime scene, that is not necessarily true. If you have been charged with a crime based on your fingerprints at a crime scene, you should talk to an experienced criminal defense lawyer at the Shah Law Firm as soon as possible.

Your attorney can carefully analyze all of the facts and circumstances of your case to identify the available defenses. Call us today at 602.560.7408 to request an appointment.

we are here to help

Fill out the form below, or call us directly at (602) 560-7408 to schedule your free, one-on-one consultation. There is no obligation and all consultations are strictly confidential.

WHAT OUR CLIENTs SAY

“I was totally impressed and grateful for the expertise and successful case Arja handled for me. She answered my calls immediately and saved me a lot of professional and personal heartache. Arja did a great job refuting the State’s evidence and convinced the Prosecutor that my chewing tobacco was a major issue in the case that the officer did not check.”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
Thomas - Super Extreme DUI
Argued Police Stop Protocols and Reduced to a Fine

“Arja represented me for a DUI case in Scottsdale. I met with her immediately after being charged and she very quickly was able to speak to the prosecutor and get my charges reduced after my initial hearings. She was attentive and easy to talk to. She gets results.”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
Jason - Scottsdale DUI
Felony Charges Reduced to Reckless Driving

“Arja was extremely knowledgeable and kept us up to date on the entire case. I would hire her and recommend her to anyone- although I hope I never need her help again! But if a problem arises I would be sure to call her!!”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
Maggie - Mesa Super Extreme DUI
Super Extreme DUI Reduced to First Time Regular DUI

“Ms. Shah got my charges completely dismissed. She worked hard, was thorough, and took care of all the details. Seriously, hire her. It’s a complete piece of mind.”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
R. Aguilera - Attempted Murder
Attempted Murder Charges DISMISSED

“During my recent DUI case and time spent working with Arja Shah, I can say I had an absolute positive Experience. She was there to represent me and handle my questions and concerns with ease. Thank you.”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
Michael - Phoenix DUI Arrest
Felony DUI Charge Reduced to a Fine

“I endorse this lawyer. She is knowledgeable as well as up-to-date on the latest case law. She is one of the very few attorneys I would recommend to family or friends.”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
Michael Pittman (Attorney Peer)

“First, Arja is a superb and energetic attorney who is always willing to listen and help out in client cases. Second, she works hard for your case to minimize or eliminate penalties for the charges you are facing. She has a good analytical mind and presents your case successfully. Third, she is approachable even outside work hours if the situation calls for it. Always punctual for meetings. Lastly, she is an affordable attorney in comparison to some big-name law firms where personalized and flexible service is almost impossible. The above review is based on my experience derived from her working on my case.”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
T. McCarty- Extreme DUI Charge Possible 30 Days Jail
Reduced to Reckless Driving and a Fine

“Attorney Arja Shah took the time to compile letters from family members and show the Prosecutor that they lacked evidence to move forward with my case. Arja did what she said she would do and was there to help me. Outstanding Attorney.”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
Andrea- Disorderly Conduct and Domestic Violence
Charged Dismissed
Click Here to Call Now