Self-Defense Against Security Guard or Bouncer: Options if a Bouncer Uses Force

free case review

Fill out the form below, or call us at
(602) 560-7408.

practice areas



Recent Blog Posts

Self-Defense Against Security Guard or Bouncer: Navigating Arizona’s Legal Landscape

In today’s increasingly security-conscious society, incidents involving security and bouncers can lead to complex legal situations.

While self-defense is a fundamental right, understanding the nuances of Arizona’s laws and how they apply to these cases is critical for anyone involved in such an incident.

This comprehensive guide will delve into the various aspects of defense against a bouncer or security guards under Arizona law.

In this article, we will explore the following:

Did you know that in 2021, over 1 million security guards were employed in the United States?

With such a large number of security personnel, altercations between guards, bouncers, and the public are bound to happen.

Understanding Arizona’s Self-Defense Laws

Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-404 outlines the justification for self-defense in the state.

According to this statute, a person is justified in using physical force to protect themselves against another’s use or attempted use of unlawful physical force, provided the person’s actions are based on a reasonable belief that such force is immediately necessary.

However, self-defense has limitations, mainly involving security personnel and bouncers.

Establishing Self-Defense Against a Security Guard or Bouncer

When it comes to establishing self-defense against security or a bouncer, there are several key factors to consider:

  • Reasonable Belief of Threat: To successfully claim self-defense, one must demonstrate a reasonable belief that they faced an imminent threat of physical harm from the security guard or bouncer. This means the fear of harm must be based on objectively reasonable grounds rather than mere speculation or paranoia.
  • Proportionate Force: The force used must be proportionate to the threat faced. In other words, the level of force used should not be excessive or more significant than necessary to prevent harm.
  • Imminent Danger: Self-defense is only justified when the danger is imminent or immediately about to happen. If the threat of harm has passed, using force in self-defense is not justified.

Situations Where Self-Defense May Not Be Justified

There are several circumstances in which self-defense may not be a valid legal defense:

  • Provocation: If the person claiming self-defense provoked the attack or engaged in aggressive behavior that led to the altercation, they may not be able to claim self-defense under Arizona law.
    • Example: Imagine a scenario where an individual deliberately taunts and insults a security guard, pushing the guard’s patience to the limit. The security guard finally loses their temper and shoves the individual, who then retaliates with physical force. In this case, the individual provoked the attack and engaged in aggressive behavior, leading to the altercation. As a result, they may not be able to claim self-defense under Arizona law.
  • Criminal Activity: Self-defense is not available to those engaged in criminal activity or using force to resist arrest.
    • Example: Suppose a person is stealing merchandise from a store when a security employee confronts them. The individual, fearing arrest, uses force against the guard to escape. In this scenario, the individual is engaged in criminal activity and using force to resist arrest, making self-defense unavailable as a valid legal defense.
  • Trespassing: If the person claiming self-defense is unlawfully present on the property where the incident occurred, their self-defense claim may be weakened or invalidated.
    • Example: Consider a situation where someone sneaks into a private event without permission. A bouncer discovers the uninvited guest and tries to remove them from the premises. The trespasser, feeling threatened, uses force against the bouncer. In this case, the person claiming self-defense was unlawfully present on the property when the incident occurred. This fact may weaken or invalidate their self-defense claim under Arizona law.

Under Arizona Revised Statutes § 32-2601, the state must license and regulate security guards and bouncers.

They have a duty to protect the property and individuals on the premises they are hired to secure, such as nightclubs, but they also have limitations on their use of force.

Use of Force by Security Guards and Bouncers

Security personnel can use reasonable force to protect themselves and others, maintain order or prevent criminal activity.

However, they are not allowed to use excessive or unnecessary force.

Understanding the distinction between reasonable and unreasonable force is crucial when determining if a self-defense claim is warranted.

Collecting Evidence to Support a Self-Defense Claim

Gathering evidence is essential in supporting a self-defense claim.

Some key types of evidence to collect include:

  • Documenting Injuries: Take photographs of injuries sustained during the incident, as these can serve as crucial evidence to support your self-defense claim.
  • Witness Testimonies: If witnesses were present during the altercation, their statements could be invaluable in corroborating your version of events and establishing the necessity of your actions.
  • Security Camera Footage: If the incident occurred in an area with security cameras, obtaining footage can provide an unbiased account of what happened and strengthen your self-defense claim.

Potential Criminal Charges and Consequences

Individuals involved in an altercation with a security guard or bouncer may face various criminal charges, such as:

  • Assault: Assault charges can arise from causing or attempting to cause physical injury to another person or placing them in fear of imminent physical injury.
  • Aggravated Assault: Aggravated assault occurs when the assault involves factors that increase its severity, such as causing severe physical injury or using a deadly weapon.
  • Criminal Trespass: If the altercation occurred while the defendant was unlawfully on the property, they might face criminal trespass charges and any other charges stemming from the incident.

Civil Liability and Personal Injury Claims

In some cases, a self-defense claim can also give rise to civil liability and personal injury claims, including:

  • Negligence: If security guard or bouncer fails to perform their duties reasonably, they may be liable for negligence.
  • Excessive Force: If the security personnel used excessive force during the incident, they could be sued for damages resulting from the injuries sustained.
  • False Imprisonment: If a security guard or bouncer unlawfully restrains someone, leading to an altercation, they may be liable for false imprisonment.

Understanding the Key Differences Between Civil Liability Claims and Criminal Charges

Civil liability claims and criminal charges are two distinct aspects of the legal system, each with its own processes, objectives, and consequences.

One of the primary differences between them is the party initiating the legal action.

In a civil liability claim, the injured party, or plaintiff, seeks compensation for damages or injuries caused by another party, known as the defendant.

The objective in a civil case is generally to obtain monetary compensation for the plaintiff’s losses, such as medical expenses, property damage, lost wages, or pain and suffering.

The standard of proof in civil cases is typical “preponderance of the evidence,” meaning that the plaintiff must show that it is more likely than not that the defendant is responsible for the claimed damages.

On the other hand, criminal charges are brought by the government, either at the state or federal level, against an individual accused of committing a crime.

The purpose of a criminal prosecution is to punish the accused for their illegal actions and protect society from further harm.

Criminal cases involve a higher burden of proof, with the prosecution required to prove the defendant’s guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Consequences for criminal convictions can range from fines and probation to imprisonment and, in some cases, even the death penalty.

In criminal cases, the focus is on penalizing the wrongdoer rather than compensating the victim, although restitution may be ordered in some instances.

Navigating Your Options When Faced with Unreasonable Force by a Bouncer

There are several options if a bouncer uses force that is considered unreasonable.

If a bouncer intentionally causes or attempts to cause physical harm to a customer, they may also face assault and battery charges.

The bouncer and their employer may be liable for the customer’s injuries in such cases. The customer may be entitled to seek compensation through a personal injury claim or lawsuit.

It’s crucial for customers to know their rights and see the following steps if a bouncer has injured them.

  • Document the incident: Take photos of any injuries, property damage, or the scene where the incident occurred. This documentation can serve as crucial evidence later on.
  • Gather witness information: Obtain contact information from anyone who witnessed the incident, as their statements could be valuable in supporting your case.
  • Report the incident: File a report with the local police department, providing them with as much information as possible about the incident.
  • Seek medical attention: If you sustained any injuries, seek medical treatment and keep records of any medical expenses and treatments received.
  • Consult with an attorney: Reach out to a criminal defense or personal injury attorney, such as The Shah Law Firm, to discuss your legal options and potential claims.
  • Preserve evidence: Save relevant evidence, such as clothing, medical records, or surveillance footage, to support your case.
  • File a complaint: File a complaint against the bouncer or the establishment they work for with the appropriate licensing authority or business bureau.
  • Pursue a civil lawsuit: If you suffered injuries or damages due to the bouncer’s unreasonable force, consider pursuing a civil lawsuit for compensation.
  • Defend against criminal charges: If you are facing criminal charges due to the incident, work with a criminal defense attorney to build a strong defense strategy and protect your rights.

The Role of a Criminal Defense Attorney in Self-Defense Cases

A skilled criminal defense attorney from The Shah Law Firm can be instrumental in helping you navigate the complexities of self-defense cases involving security guards and bouncers.

Their expertise includes the following:

  • Building a Strong Defense Strategy: A criminal defense lawyer will thoroughly analyze the facts of your case, gather evidence, and build a solid defense strategy to support your self-defense claim.
  • Navigating the Legal System: The legal system can be confusing and overwhelming. A knowledgeable attorney will guide you through the process, ensuring you understand your rights and options at every stage.
  • Protecting Your Rights: A criminal defense attorney will zealously advocate for your rights, working to achieve the best possible outcome for your case.


You Need a Criminal Defense Attorney to Help Navigate Self-Defense Cases

Top Arizona DUI Defense Attorney Arja Shah If you find yourself in a situation where you need to defend yourself against criminal charges stemming from an altercation with a security guard or bouncer, contact The Shah Law Firm to discuss your case with an experienced criminal defense attorney.

Remember, time is of the essence, and having legal representation can make all the difference in the outcome of your case.

Don’t let an altercation with a security guard or bouncer derail your life; contact us today at (602) 560-7408 for a free consultation, and let our legal team work for you.

we are here to help

Fill out the form below, or call us directly at (602) 560-7408 to schedule your free, one-on-one consultation. There is no obligation and all consultations are strictly confidential.


“I was totally impressed and grateful for the expertise and successful case Arja handled for me. She answered my calls immediately and saved me a lot of professional and personal heartache. Arja did a great job refuting the State’s evidence and convinced the Prosecutor that my chewing tobacco was a major issue in the case that the officer did not check.”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
Thomas - Super Extreme DUI
Argued Police Stop Protocols and Reduced to a Fine

“Arja represented me for a DUI case in Scottsdale. I met with her immediately after being charged and she very quickly was able to speak to the prosecutor and get my charges reduced after my initial hearings. She was attentive and easy to talk to. She gets results.”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
Jason - Scottsdale DUI
Felony Charges Reduced to Reckless Driving

“Arja was extremely knowledgeable and kept us up to date on the entire case. I would hire her and recommend her to anyone- although I hope I never need her help again! But if a problem arises I would be sure to call her!!”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
Maggie - Mesa Super Extreme DUI
Super Extreme DUI Reduced to First Time Regular DUI

“Ms. Shah got my charges completely dismissed. She worked hard, was thorough, and took care of all the details. Seriously, hire her. It’s a complete piece of mind.”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
R. Aguilera - Attempted Murder
Attempted Murder Charges DISMISSED

“During my recent DUI case and time spent working with Arja Shah, I can say I had an absolute positive Experience. She was there to represent me and handle my questions and concerns with ease. Thank you.”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
Michael - Phoenix DUI Arrest
Felony DUI Charge Reduced to a Fine

“I endorse this lawyer. She is knowledgeable as well as up-to-date on the latest case law. She is one of the very few attorneys I would recommend to family or friends.”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
Michael Pittman (Attorney Peer)

“First, Arja is a superb and energetic attorney who is always willing to listen and help out in client cases. Second, she works hard for your case to minimize or eliminate penalties for the charges you are facing. She has a good analytical mind and presents your case successfully. Third, she is approachable even outside work hours if the situation calls for it. Always punctual for meetings. Lastly, she is an affordable attorney in comparison to some big-name law firms where personalized and flexible service is almost impossible. The above review is based on my experience derived from her working on my case.”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
T. McCarty- Extreme DUI Charge Possible 30 Days Jail
Reduced to Reckless Driving and a Fine

“Attorney Arja Shah took the time to compile letters from family members and show the Prosecutor that they lacked evidence to move forward with my case. Arja did what she said she would do and was there to help me. Outstanding Attorney.”

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
Andrea- Disorderly Conduct and Domestic Violence
Charged Dismissed

Considering the amount of charges I was facing I ended up with the minimum charges I could have received. If it wasn’t for Ms/Mrs. Shah, I would have had to given up everything. I will forever recommend to anybody in need…

Arja Shah Law Firm Reviews
Tyler Goodwill - DUI
Charges Reduced to Minimum
Click Here to Call Now